S&P 500 Record Sets Up a Santa Rally. This Could Be the Stock Market’s Scrooge and 4 Other Things to Know Today.

A Christmas tree outside the New York Stock Exchange

Is it beginning to look a lot like a Santa Claus rally?

Christmas came early for investors as the S&P 500 closed at a record high on Tuesday for the 38th time this year. Sparking holiday cheer was news that the U.S. economy grew at its fastest pace in two years in the third quarter, far ahead of expectations.

It looks like the perfect setup for a Santa rally —the tendency for stocks to drift higher from Christmas Eve into early January.

Without wanting to play Scrooge, investors should remember that markets are as barren as Charlie Brown’s Christmas tree this week—with Tuesday having the lowest trading volumes since Jan. 3, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

Thin volumes make it harder to gauge market consensus. The strong economic report can be taken at face value, but it could also mean the Federal Reserve is less likely to cut interest rates if the economy is hot.

Low trading volumes can also bring volatility, as relatively little selling may spark outsize moves, so investors should be ready for bumps on any sleigh ride to a year-end rally.

Central bank shifts in Japan have already pushed up Treasury yields this week. U.S.-Venezuela tensions continue and could drive oil prices higher, raising inflation risks and lowering the likelihood of an imminent Fed rate cut.

In what has become a defining 2025 trend, however, optimism over artificial intelligence may be relied upon to fend off the Grinch: Nvidia stock is up 7.5% over the past five days amid signs that Chinese companies are fueling demand for AI chips.

The best bet for investors during this period may be to not overthink, especially with trading volumes so low. It all gets more serious next week, as the turkey is digested and New Year’s resolutions begin.

—Jack Denton

***The Barron’s Daily will take a break for the holiday and next publish on Monday, Dec. 29.

Control your news feed. Set Barron’s as a top source in Google for a more personalized experience.

***

A Hot Economy and Cooling Jobs Leave Fed in a Bind

The economy grew at its fastest pace in two years in the third quarter, far exceeding expectations and highlighting the widening gap between strong output and a cooling labor market. For Federal Reserve officials, the data reinforce that while demand is firm, inflation is still running above target.

• Citigroup economists said the upside surprise does little to alter the Fed’s policy outlook, though the divergence between solid growth and weaker hiring could sharpen internal divisions. And risks are mounting for the fourth quarter, according to Oliver Allen, senior U.S. economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics.
• Allen said recent data point to a slowdown in consumer spending, as weaker hiring, stagnant real incomes, and the exhaustion of pandemic-era excess savings begin to weigh on households. Pantheon expects headline growth to slow to around 0.5% to 1% in the final quarter of the year.
• Inflation-adjusted GDP rose 4.3% from July through September versus a year earlier. The report, delayed by the recent government shutdown, far exceeded the 3% growth expected. Growth accelerated from a 3.8% pace in the second quarter and marked the strongest expansion since the third quarter of 2023.
• The strong headline figure was driven by faster consumer spending, stronger exports, higher government outlays, and a smaller drag from investment and imports. Much of that upside, however, reflected unusual trade dynamics tied to President Donald Trump’s tariff renegotiations, which cut imports and boosted exports.

What’s Next: Economists cautioned that the scale and composition of the third quarter’s growth are unlikely to be sustained. Allen said the 1.6 percentage point contribution from net trade was unusually large and is likely to reverse, either through revisions or a drag from inventories in coming quarters.

— Nicole Goodkind and Megan Leonhardt

***

M&A Soared This Year. Momentum Is Pushing Into 2026.

Mergers and acquisitions made a splash this year, and the momentum can keep going into 2026, driven by combinations of technology and industrial companies. Together those two sectors were the most active in 2025, notching nearly $1.4 trillion in deals out of a total of $4.4 trillion.

• The London Stock Exchange Group says deals are on pace to hit $4.55 trillion for the full year, which would be 30% above last year. Larger deals, rather than the number of deals, is driving the gains. One example is Netflix’s $72 billion offer for Warner Bros.’ studio and streaming assets.
• Looking into 2026, there’s more money out there for deals. Already, two-thirds of the hundreds of corporate and private equity buyers that KPMG surveyed expect a larger deal pipeline in 2026 versus this year. Inflation has dropped, as have interest rates, and there is the possibility for further cuts.
• Private-equity funds have large amounts of cash for deals, sitting around $2.2 trillion today, according to S&P Global. While it’s difficult to know when exactly funds will invest all of that money, they’ll use at least some of it next year because of their investment mandates.
• Tech is a big draw for buyers. Large software companies are hunting for smaller companies to build out their artificial intelligence and other offerings. In cybersecurity, Palo Alto and CrowdStrike sit at the top of a sector that Wedbush’s Dan Ives believes is ripe for M&A.

What’s Next: Healthcare could also see elevated deal activity. There are currently hundreds of biotechnology companies valued at a few billion dollars or less that could easily fit under the roof of large pharmaceutical companies, which have already been active in acquiring small biotechs.

— Jacob Sonenshine

***

Alibaba Shows China May Be Next Frontier for Nvidia, AMD

China’s fast-growing artificial intelligence sector may be readying for major purchases of U.S. chips, creating opportunities and competition for Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. There could be significant upside if U.S. chip companies are able to capitalize on Chinese chip demand and navigate shifting trade tensions.

• Raymond James analysts led by Simon Leopold optimistically see revenue upside of $500 million to $800 million for AMD, boosting adjusted earnings by 20 cents a share next year. For Nvidia, China sales upside could be $7 billion to $12.5 billion, a boost of 30 cents a share.
• Nvidia plans to ship as many as 80,000 of its H200 chips to China by mid-February, Reuters reported this week, citing unnamed sources. Nvidia told Barron’s that “licensed sales of the H200 to authorized customers in China will have no impact on our ability to supply customers in the United States.”
• AMD’s China-compliant artificial intelligence accelerator chips are close to commercial rollout, and Alibaba plans to buy as many as 50,000, trade publication MLex reported on Monday. The Chinese online retail and cloud computing giant has emerged as one of China’s AI leaders this year.
• Regulatory risks loom large, however. “Questions remain regarding whether the Chinese government will allow or discourage its cloud operators from purchasing advanced GPUs, as well as how the U.S. government’s export license fee will be accounted for,” the Raymond James analysts wrote.

What’s Next: China promises some nice potential upside for Nvidia—but, ultimately, the company seems to know that its core business will remain in chip making, where it dominates. It restructured its cloud group after retreating from competition against Amazon Web Services, the Information reported.

— Jack Denton

***

Apple CEO Tim Cook Buys $3 Million of Nike Stock

Plenty of Americans will find a Just Do It T-shirt or a fresh pair of Air Force 1s in their stockings tomorrow. Apple CEO Tim Cook also bought himself a Nike Christmas present, snapping up $3 million of the sportswear maker’s shares.

• Cook, a Nike board member since 2005, bought 50,000 shares on Monday at an average price of $58.97, according to a form 4 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission late Tuesday. Cook now holds just over 105,000 of the company’s shares.
• Nike stock was rising in thin trading ahead of Wednesday’s opening bell. The shares are down about 25% this year and are below where they stood 10 years ago, as new CEO Elliott Hill struggles to turn the sneaker giant around.
• The shares fell more than 10% after the company reported results for its second fiscal quarter last week. Although Nike’s earnings and revenue surpassed expectations, investors were disappointed by declining profits and lackluster sales in China.

What’s Next: The feeling on Wall Street is that that selloff could represent an opportunity to snap up the beaten-down stock. Jefferies analyst Randal Konik rates Nike Buy, with a price target of $110 that implies the shares can rally 92% from their current level. “With shares near multi-year lows, we would buy at these levels. Just BUY It,” Konik wrote in a research note on Friday.

— Andrew Bary, Sabrina Escobar, and George Glover

***

Dear Quentin,

We’re a married couple in our early 40s.

We’re both teachers, with a combined gross income of $210,000. Each year, we max out our Roth IRAs and our HSA, which we invest. Our medical expenses have been minimal so far, so we’ve kept detailed records but haven’t reimbursed ourselves yet.

In total, we have $300,000 in our IRAs (mostly Roth) and $96,000 in the HSA. We also keep $150,000 in a high-yield savings account for emergencies and upcoming home renovations, and our only debt is a small mortgage.

We’ll both receive pensions in retirement. Based on our years of service, we’d each get about 50% of our salaries if we retire at 55, increasing gradually to a maximum of 75% by age 63. One of us will also qualify for a small Social Security benefit.

Here’s where we differ: One of us wants to start contributing to a 403(b) to boost retirement savings and potentially retire early. The other feels we should start saving for our three kids’ college education, they’re 10, 12 and 14, since we currently have no college savings.

Are we on track for retirement? Should we shift focus toward college savings instead? And how realistic is it these days for children to pay their own way through college, like we did back in the early 2000s?

— Happily Married

Read the Moneyist’s response here.

— Quentin Fottrell

***

—Newsletter edited by Liz Moyer, Patrick O’Donnell, Callum Keown